Judging Overview
RUBRIC GUIDELINE
| A. JUDGES (STANDARD) The judges for the International Competition and Exhibition on Computing Innovation (iCE-CInno) are comprised of professionals and educators in Computing and Computing-related areas. They have been drawn from various levels of government agencies, educational institutions, and private enterprises. Wherever possible, a judge’s expertise or area of specialty will be considered in assigning projects to be evaluated. Each project is to be evaluated by at least three judges. |
| B. JUDGING CRITERIA Marks will be awarded as follows: Category STC- Skills Training Center, UG- IPT (Undergraduate), PG- IPT (Postgraduate), OC - Open Category & IT- International |
| Innovation (25%) • This project involves the development and evaluation of innovative devices, models, techniques, or approaches in computing (both hardware or software). • The participant can present his/her invention’s features, functions, and structures completely and clearly. |
| Commercialization and Marketability (20%) • Potential in terms of marketability (will attract buyers from across regions and producible at a cost that'll generate profit). • Potential for technology transfer/patent. |
| Performance and Practicality (15%) • Simple operation, easy maintenance, and compatible with variety of systems. • Workable and meets the needs. |
| Aesthetic (10%) • Quality/suitability in terms of shape, colour, materials, user-friendly interface, system performance, and flow of operation. |
| Presentation (25%) • The overall video presentation is attractive, engaging, clear, well-organized, and complete. • Slides, demonstrations, and supporting materials are organized, purposeful, easy to view, effective, and suitable for online presentation. • The presenter is able to explain the project in a comprehensive, confident, and enthusiastic manner. This includes demonstrations, references to supporting information, visual aids, and the overall presentation flow. • Appropriate video presentation techniques, clear audio quality, effective visual aids, and demonstrations are utilized to engage the evaluators effectively. |
| Publication (5%) • The project has been published on platforms. |